CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-13900F
Key Findings
- The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 15.6%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior performance with a 33.9% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
56th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs12th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Intel Core i9-13900F
Release Date
Q1 2023
Market Position
134th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs34th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs34th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
285K
5,121
i9-13900F
4,429
Multi-Thread Performance
285K
68,590
i9-13900F
51,218
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-13900F
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
285K
Intel Core i9-13900F
i9-13900F
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 285K, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
285K
13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900F, 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900F
i9-13900F
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
285K
N/A
i9-13900F
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
285K
N/A
i9-13900F
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
285K
N/A
i9-13900F
🔌Socket
FCLGA1851
285K
FCLGA1700
i9-13900F
âš¡TDP
125 W
285K
65 W
i9-13900F
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
285K
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-13900F
The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core i9-13900F compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i9-13900F takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K drawing more power under load (125W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.