CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900F

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 14.5%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior performance with a 45.0% advantage

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2024

Market Position

56th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs1st fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs12th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Core i9-14900F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

155th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs42nd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

285K

5,121

i9-14900F

4,472

Multi-Thread Performance

285K

68,590

i9-14900F

47,298

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core i9-14900F

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

285K

Intel Core i9-14900F

i9-14900F

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 285K, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

285K

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F

i9-14900F

⚡Base Clock

N/A

285K

N/A

i9-14900F

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

285K

N/A

i9-14900F

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

285K

N/A

i9-14900F

🔌Socket

FCLGA1851

285K

FCLGA1700

i9-14900F

⚡TDP

125 W

285K

65 W

i9-14900F

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

285K

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900F

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core i9-14900F compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i9-14900F takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K drawing more power under load (125W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.