CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Key Findings

All CPUs perform similarly in single-threaded tasks
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior performance with a 10.7% advantage

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2024

Market Position

56th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs1st fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs12th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2024

Market Position

80th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs20th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

285K

5,121

265KF

4,956

Multi-Thread Performance

285K

68,590

265KF

61,964

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

285K

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

265KF

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 285K, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

285K

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 265KF

265KF

⚡Base Clock

N/A

285K

N/A

265KF

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

285K

N/A

265KF

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

285K

N/A

265KF

🔌Socket

FCLGA1851

285K

FCLGA1851

265KF

⚡TDP

125 W

285K

125 W

265KF

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

285K

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 30 MB

265KF

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF drawing more power under load (125W vs 125W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.