CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Key Findings
- The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 51.1%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 88.8% advantage
- The AMD Ryzen 5 2600H has the highest core count with 4 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
Release Date
Q1 2019
Market Position
1384th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs1362nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs321st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
2600H
2,085
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
2600H
8,002
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H
2600H
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H with Radeon Vega Graphics
2600H
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
164U
3.2 GHz
2600H
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
3.6 GHz
2600H
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
4 Threads: 8
2600H
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
FP5
2600H
âš¡TDP
9 W
164U
45 W
2600H
💾Cache
N/A
164U
L1 Instruction Cache: 4 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 4 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 4 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 4 MB
2600H
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 5 2600H takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 5 2600H drawing more power under load (45W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.