CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 277.8%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 3566.5% advantage
The Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2009

Market Position

4452nd fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs3560th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1235th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.20GHz

834

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.20GHz

412

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz

2.20GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 900 @ 2.20GHz, Intel Celeron CPU 900 @ 2.20GHz

2.20GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.2 GHz

2.20GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.20GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

2.20GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

PGA478

2.20GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

34.8 W

2.20GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

2.20GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz drawing more power under load (34W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.