CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 25.2%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior performance with a 38.3% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
56th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs1st fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs12th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2023
Market Position
143rd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs78th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs38th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

285K
5,121
7945WX
4,091

Multi-Thread Performance

285K
68,590
7945WX
49,607

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
285K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
7945WX
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 9 285K, Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
285K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX 12-Cores
7945WX
⚡Base Clock
N/A
285K
4.7 GHz
7945WX
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
285K
5.3 GHz
7945WX
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
285K
12 Threads: 24
7945WX
🔌Socket
FCLGA1851
285K
sTR5
7945WX
⚡TDP
125 W
285K
350 W
7945WX
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
285K
L1 Instruction Cache: 12 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 12 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 12 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB
7945WX

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX drawing more power under load (350W vs 125W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.